Biofuels
Food or Fuel?
1.
PRO
|
CONS
|
-sustainable alternative to fossil fuels
|
-fewer crops available for food
|
-reduced green house gas emissions
|
-world wide prices increase (50%),
|
-renewability
|
-affect the poor around the world
|
-energy independence
|
-37 countries may be facing food security
|
-food riots in countries such as Haiti and Egypt
| |
-increase in aggregate fertilizer use leads to poor water quality, nutrient runoff and Erosion.
|
2. Do you think the pros outweigh the cons of using “food for fuel”? Why or why not?
The pros most certainly do not outweigh the cons in this situation, unfortunately. Although the new ideas seem to be great for the environment in some aspects, it is hurting it in other ways. There is already a food shortage in most countries and by using food to create fuels means taking away even more food from those in need. With our growing world, it is becoming more difficult for people to produce enough food to feed everyone. Although this plan doesn’t really seem to work out, I believe that finding a new source of fuel is necessary for our world.
The EU calls time on first-generation biofuels
1. What is the E.U. proposing to do regarding “first-generation” biofuels? Why?
Basically, they are trying to put a limit on the amount of biofuels that Europe uses. They want to cap it because they feel like “some of the biofuels are as bad as, or even worse than the fossil fuels that they replace”.
2. Why are biofuel proponents upset? Are environmentalists upset too?
Biofuel proponents are upset because they think it’s sending the wrong message saying that the policy shows no policy coherence or predictability. In addition, there is now uncertainty of who is paying for the fuels because the first generation providers are out of the picture.Environmentalists are also upset because they feel that the EU missed a good chanced to fix mistakes from the past by admitting mistakes of the original first-generation fuels.
No comments:
Post a Comment