Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Food Safety in America: How Safe is Our Food?

http://barfblog.com/2013/02/lettuce-sickens-hacks-hack-leafy-green-marketing-agreements-set-a-bar-but-its-still-too-low/lettuce-tomato-skull-3/





 

 

 

 

 

Ten Facts to Know about the U.S. Food Safety System

1. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that each year 76 million American get sick, 325,000 are hospitalized, and 5,000 die from food-borne hazards. Food-borne illness is surprisingly common in the U.S. and can be as little as mild cramps or diarrhea. It is suggested that countless occurrences go unreported each year because not all food-borne illness is severe enough for treatment and may last for a very short period of time. The individuals most at risk are children, senior citizens, and the immunocompromised. They are much more likely than healthy adults to become severely ill from food-borne hazards.

2. The USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) handles meat, poultry, and dairy. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) handles everything else. In the period 1990 to 2006, more food-borne illness outbreaks fell under the jurisdiction of the FDA (67%) than under the USDA (27%). Of the country’s food supply, the FDA handles about 80% and the USDA handles 20%.


3. Despite the distribution of outbreaks, the USDA gets twice the budgetary expenditures for food safety programs and inspections that the FDA gets.

4. The FDA inspects food processing facilities once every 10 years. The USDA inspects meat and dairy facilities daily. This is due to the difference in funding.

5. There is confusion and discrepancy over which agency handles certain products. For example, frozen pizza is divided between the agencies based on the pizza toppings. Frozen cheese pizza facilities are inspected by the FDA (about once every 10 years). Frozen pepperoni pizza facilities are inspected by the USDA (daily).

6. The FDA is empowered (by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act) to intervene only when food is found to be adulterated or misbranded. In comparison, the USDA which must approve meat products for them to be sold.

7. Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems are currently in place for seafood, juice, meat, and poultry products, but not other products. This analysis system helps to assure safety and quality of food products. 

8. Unfortunately, less than 1 percent of food imported into the U.S. is inspected. Only foreign meat must be approved for sale in the U.S. Additionally, the FDA cannot inspect processing plants in other countries unless invited. This lack in foreign food control can result in a loss in quality and provide a safety risk.

9. The August-September 2006 E. coli in bagged spinach outbreak (that killed three people) was due to contamination of the environment in which the spinach grew. Manure piles were found near the spinach farming operation. E. coli is commonly found in the intestinal tract of animals and humans. Only specific strains, like the E. coli O157:H7 strain found specifically in the gut of cows, causes illness in humans. These “bad” E. coli strains can easily be spread by manure runoff and has become increasingly common in produce-related outbreaks. Unfortunately, although farming falls under the FDA, the FDA has limited control over farming operations.

10. The FDA does not have the power to order a producer to recall any food product found to be contaminated. As wrong as it seems, the FDA cannot immediately force a producer to recall a contaminated food product unless the product is infant formula. Recall is voluntary. If a producer refuses to recall a contaminated product, the FDA can go through legal proceedings to force a recall, but it takes a long time. During an outbreak, waiting to recall a product for weeks or even days can result in more illness and death.


Five Changes in U.S. Food Safety System the will come from the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

FDA Inspectionhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/39736050@N02/4459953776/in/photolist-7N7qSL-dx2DLW-adUW55-bxN2BP-bxN2KT-bjTa7o-dYrBot-8S6p51-9G1r7x-akMbJE-ak7v4x-b6LxfK-bxN2m8-bjT9wf-bjT9L3-bxN2dM-bjT9su-bjT9x5-8S6p7b-8S3iCZ-fL4g9f-fKLEEH-fKLECF-fKLEtT-fKLEBg-fKLEqP-fL4fRE-fL4g19-fKLEJk-fKLEJP-cRFSP9-bNkHrP-8S6p6q-fL4fuC-fL4fZq-9Ttvjy-fKLEun-ac2qjK-8VUWXg-aUvVze-7R7GdY-7R7FJ1-7N6pCr-bSufnp-7R4qHp-cMsNSw-dvEZ5N-bxN2hZ-bxN29V-bjT9zy-bjT9GL





Clearly, the current food safety system has many issues. The FDA has limited funding and resources to properly handle and prevent food-borne outbreaks. The Food Safety Modernization Act, signed in 2011, will provide the FDA with the resources needed to effectively prevent outbreaks rather than simply dealing with the aftermath.

1. The new law will establish minimum standards for the safe production and harvesting of fruits and vegetables. These standards include naturally occurring and introduced hazards. The FDA will address soil amendments, hygiene, packaging, temperature controls, animals in the area, and water when inspecting produce farming operations.

2. The new law establishes a mandatory inspection frequency for food facilities. The exact frequency will depend on an individual product’s risk.
 

3. The new law gives the FDA authority to issue a mandatory recall if a company fails to implement a voluntary recall after being asked by FDA. Now, recalls can be implemented sooner in an outbreak.

4. The new law will establish a system that will enhance ability to trace both domestic and imported foods.

5. Under the new law, the FDA will explicitly place the responsibility on importers to verify that their foreign suppliers have adequate preventive controls in place to ensure that the food they produce is safe.

Although we are on the path to positive change in our food safety system, all the changes are still in progress.


Who is to Blame for Meat and Poultry Outbreaks: the producer or the consumer?

Salmonella
http://www.flickr.com/photos/niaid/5613656967/








Over a year ago, a Salmonella outbreak affecting 100 people was traced to Foster Farms chicken. In response to the outbreak, Foster Farms did NOT recall their product.  According to Foster Farms, Salmonella is common in all chicken. So ultimately, the responsibility falls on the individual or individuals that prepare the food. This means avoiding cross contamination caused by using a single knife or cutting board for multiple food products, cooking products to the recommended temperature to kill pathogens, maintaining sanitary conditions in the food preparation area, and practicing good personal hygiene (washing hands). But is this the right mentality to have?

Who do you think should be held responsible? The consumers that do not properly handle meat and poultry to kill potential pathogens or the producers that provide raw products that they know are contaminated?

Tuesday, February 18, 2014


Biofuels


Food or Fuel? 

1. 


PRO
CONS
-sustainable alternative to fossil fuels
-fewer crops available for food
-reduced green house gas emissions
-world wide prices increase (50%),
-renewability
-affect the poor around the world
-energy independence
-37 countries may be facing food security

-food riots in countries such as Haiti and Egypt

-increase in aggregate fertilizer use leads to poor water quality, nutrient runoff and Erosion.

2. Do you think the pros outweigh the cons of using “food for fuel”?  Why or why not?

The pros most certainly do not outweigh the cons in this situation, unfortunately. Although the new ideas seem to be great for the environment in some aspects, it is hurting it in other ways. There is already a food shortage in most countries and by using food to create fuels means taking away even more food from those in need. With our growing world, it is becoming more difficult for people to produce enough food to feed everyone. Although this plan doesn’t really seem to work out, I believe that finding a new source of fuel is necessary for our world. 



The EU calls time on first-generation biofuels

1.      What is the E.U. proposing to do regarding “first-generation” biofuels?  Why?

Basically, they are trying to put a limit on the amount of biofuels that Europe uses. They want to cap it because they feel like “some of the biofuels are as bad as, or even worse than the fossil fuels that they replace”.

2. Why are biofuel proponents upset?  Are environmentalists upset too? 

 Biofuel proponents are upset because they think it’s sending the wrong message saying that the policy shows no policy coherence or predictability. In addition, there is now uncertainty of who is paying for the fuels because the first generation providers are out of the picture. 
Environmentalists are also upset because they feel that the EU missed a good chanced to fix mistakes from the past by admitting mistakes of the original first-generation fuels.

3. "Second-generation" biofuels 

Second-generation biofuels use the inedible parts of plants for energy. This way there isn’t any competition with getting food to people and using it for machinery.


Ethanol Fading? 

1. Why are times so gloomy for ethanol producers?

The droughts have been killing most of the crops, increasing the cost of the products, causining many ethanol plants to shut down. There are many barrels of ethanol just sitting in storage because there isn’t enough gasoline to mix it with. In addition to this, the value of ethanol has decreased because the gasoline prices aren’t too bad right now.

2. How is the ethanol plant in Macon, Missouri (owned by POET) changing to confront the changes in the ethanol market?

The plant in Macon is undergoing $13 Million in renovations, in hopes that it will make the plant more efficient and cost effective. With new technology, construction and ideas, the plant hopes to turn things around by producing an extra three-tenths of a gallon of ethanol per bushel of corn. 


EPA Proposals

1. Why is the EPA proposing to reduce the required amount of ethanol mixed with gasoline?

They say that most cars on the line can only take a certain amount of ethanol in the gasoline mixture, and that there isn’t a very high demand for the new fuel. Because of new ways to find oil such as fracking, using ethanol as an ulterior method isn’t as important any more. In addition, people who drive “flex-fuel” vehicles aren’t entirely sure how much ethanol they actually can use, causing sales to be lower then expected.



Tuesday, February 11, 2014

The Role of Agribusinesses in Food Systems

1.    



S    Schreiber Foods, Inc.


Schreiber Foods, Incorporated is a manufacturer of cheese that is used in fast food franchises, grocery stores, and food service operators. The headquarters is located out of Green Bay, Wisconsin, but the company is present in more than 20 countries. The privately owned corporation is the number one provider to grocery stores, food service operators, universities and hospitals with an average of $1.23 billion in annual sales. Schreiber Foods, Inc. main competition is with other companies that distribute raw and processed dairy products.


Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Agriculture Policy


A.1  How have government farms subsidies impacted the United States? The world? 

The farms subsidies seems like a burden to the United States and doesn't really help agricultural 
industry. First of all, the farms subsidies are huge amount of money which could be a large pressure
on tax-payers which includes both producers and consumers. Usually the farms subsidies kicks in 
when the price is low. It seems like a really nice deal but it could also cause overproduction which 
keeps the price low and harms the environment.

A.2  What would be the implications of eliminating subsidies? Consider both American farmers – of all types – and farmers in developing countries (e.g., countries in Africa) – who would benefit or be harmed by ending U.S. farm subsidies?  How?

Subsidies make the cost of producing in America easier and help the American farmers to keep the 
price lower then their competitors such as the foreign farmers. The difference in price makes the 
products from America more competitive than products from countries without farms subsidies in 
the global market.

B.1  Are there “crop subsidy”-type provisions in the CAP? If so, how do they compare to U.S. subsidies?
There is crop subsidy in CAP. Unlike the subsidies in U.S., which goes to ordinary farmers, it

only goes to the wealthy landowners and businessmen. 

B.2  Is the CAP viewed in the same light as U.S. subsidies?  Does it have the same type of economic impact or effects as U.S. subsidies?
      Many European countries seems benefit from CAP payments much more than the American 
      agriculture benefit from U.S. subsidies. 
      Manny European countries especially Western-european countries benefits from CAP a lot such as         France, the biggest agricultural producer in Europe. However, just like American subsidies, it also         cause the inequality in the price in global market.


C.1 What changes are being made to government policy for for milk, cheese, and butter prices?
The 70-year-old policy is abandoned and a bill will offer insurance to farmers to protect themselves from unexpected flow in price of milk and feed.