...and everyday brings more and more news stories about this year's farm bill.
Here's one of many. This one is from NPR. Click here to go to the story.
Welcome! This blog is the home for AG BM/INTAG/ 470 A,B -- Comparing U.S./French Ag and Food Systems, and its May trip to Paris!
Friday, January 31, 2014
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
ORGANIC FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
By
Carlen Stadnik
Based on: Prof. Edward Jaenicke and National Organic Program, USDA.
What
is Organic?
Organic is a label for
agricultural products that are produced with approved substances under specific
biological, mechanical, and cultural methods that support biodiversity,
ecological balance, and the recycling of natural resources.
Under
what conditions can the USDA organic seal be used?
The
USDA organic seal can only be used to label, sell, or represent raw or
processed products under the USDA organic regulations. Processors or “handlers” must be
certified. For example, a dairy farm
that processes organic cheese needs to be certified for both milk production
and cheese processing. Misuse of the label can result in a fine of up to $11,000
for each individual violation. The
USDA performs investigations and enforcement activities to confirm that organic
labeled products satisfy the USDA organic regulations. CFR Section 205
displays USDA organic standards, prohibited practices, requirements, and the National
List of Allowed and Prohibited Materials.
Suppose
you were considering buying organic poultry and you saw competing (non-organic)
poultry product labeled “no added hormones.”
What would you think of this competing claim?
In
addition to the organic label, “no added hormones” and “raised without hormones” are examples of other labels for
livestock that are verified by the USDA Food Inspection Service. Synthetic growth hormone or steroid use in
poultry, pork, or goat has never been permitted by federal regulations. When considering hormones, organic poultry is
no different from non-organic poultry labeled as “no added hormones.” Therefore, this label should not influence
the choice of the consumer. Other
differences between the organic and the non-organic option should instead influence
the consumer’s decision.
In
addition, consumers often confuse hormones with prophylactic antibiotics. Prophylactic antibiotics are used for
prevention purposes. Antibiotics are fed
to chickens, hogs, and cows to keep them healthy, so they can grow faster. They protect the animals against their
exposure to stress, such as being enclosed in a small space with many other
animals. Organic regulations require
antibiotic use when animals are diagnosed as sick, but prohibit prophylactic
use.
Synthetic
hormones are only permitted in milk production.
The use of the rBST synthetic growth hormone is permitted for
dairy cows. The use of this hormone was very common, but not anymore because it’s not worth the sum of the direct and
indirect costs. The direct costs indicate
the price of the hormone and the indirect costs denote the possible poor
long-term health of the cows.
What are the four (big) things that
may not be used in organic agriculture?
Genetically modified organisms (GMO’s), synthetic
fertilizers and pesticides, radiation, and sewage sludge may not be used in
organic agriculture.
Suppose
you are a small farm growing a few crops using organic methods. Do you need to get USDA certification to use
the word “organic” in any marketing or sales materials?
A small
farm that grows a few crops using organic methods and sells less than $5,000 of
products per year does not need to obtain USDA certification to use the word
“organic” in any marketing or sales materials as long as the USDA organic seal is
not used. The farm must become certified
if sales increase beyond the $5,000 per year threshold. To become certified, there is a specific
organic certification process that must be followed. The farm owner must apply to a USDA-accredited certifying agent and provide specific information for
acceptance.
Is USDA organic certification free? If not, what can you tell me about
certification costs?
The USDA organic
certification is not free. The
certification costs depend on the type, size, and complexity of the operation
and the certifying agent. The costs may
be between a few hundred to several thousand dollars. Before applying, it is
important to understand the certifier’s fee structure and billing cycle. There
is an application fee, assessment on annual production or sales, annual renewal
fee, and inspection fee. The USDA
Organic Certification Cost-Share Programs can reimburse the operation up to
seventy-five percent of the certification costs after certification.
Supposed
you, a small farmer, became convinced that you wanted to convert to organic
methods immediately. How long, if at
all, would you have to wait before you could sell certified organic products?
An owner of a
small farm must use organic methods for three full years before using an
organic label. Labeling with the USDA
organic or certifying agent’s seal, selling, or representing products as
“organic” is prohibited before three years.
Land used for raw organic produces must not have prohibited substances
applied to it for three years, as well.
Name
and explain three challenges facing the U.S. organic industry.
The U.S. organic production has more
than doubled, since the 1990’s. However,
the more rapid growth of the consumer market has caused an input and product
shortage in organic supply chains. High
cost products and competition from new environmental labels are also challenges
facing the U.S. organic industry.
Extra resourcers of Thurday's discussion of organic food and agricutlure
On Thursday, Jan. 30, we will try to discuss three topics:
1. Links between organic food and health. See this blog post from last year: click here. If you look at one thing, look at this!
Questions:
Is organic food healthier? Does it matter?
2. Organic food in France:
A. Here's a short presentation (in English) about the market for organic food in France: click here.
B. A Canadian report on the market for organic packaged food in France: click here.
Questions:
How similar (or different) is the market for organic food in France to here in the U.S.?
3. Stump Jaenicke on organic. I think I know a lot about organic food. Think up (hard) questions and ask me.
4. If time: Beyond organic - local food, sustainable, and other related labels and issues. Have a look at this NY Times article: click here.
1. Links between organic food and health. See this blog post from last year: click here. If you look at one thing, look at this!
Questions:
Is organic food healthier? Does it matter?
2. Organic food in France:
A. Here's a short presentation (in English) about the market for organic food in France: click here.
B. A Canadian report on the market for organic packaged food in France: click here.
Questions:
How similar (or different) is the market for organic food in France to here in the U.S.?
3. Stump Jaenicke on organic. I think I know a lot about organic food. Think up (hard) questions and ask me.
4. If time: Beyond organic - local food, sustainable, and other related labels and issues. Have a look at this NY Times article: click here.
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
More Resources on GMOs: Comparings Apples and Oranges
For class on Thursday, Jan. 23, we will be literally compare apples and oranges, at least as they relate to GMOs.
Here are some resources:
An NPR story on GMO apples by Dan Charles from January 08, 2014: click here.
A NY Times story on GMO oranges by Amy Harmon from July 27, 2013: click here.
A 28-part (!) series in Grist on GMOs by Nathanael Johnson, from July 2013 to January 2014:
click here.
Here are some resources:
An NPR story on GMO apples by Dan Charles from January 08, 2014: click here.
A NY Times story on GMO oranges by Amy Harmon from July 27, 2013: click here.
A 28-part (!) series in Grist on GMOs by Nathanael Johnson, from July 2013 to January 2014:
click here.
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Genetically Modified Organisms
Garrett Lattanzio
1/21/14
INTAG 470
|
Genetically modified organisms
|
Based on: UN/WHO, 20 Questions On Genetically Modified
(Gm) Foods, http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/20questions/en/
1.
How does WHO
define genetically modified organisms?
List any lingering questions or concerns about this definition
The
WHO defines a genetically modified organism as one that has had its DNA altered
artificially and does not occur naturally.
I think the way that they state “not occur naturally” is not accurate to
a point. Most of the traits do occur
naturally in some organism, but just not in that specific organism that is
being modified.
2.What are some of the policies and outlooks of the
EU in relation to GMO’s?
The
European Union has very strong legislature against GMOs; for a GMO to be made
available for use it must go through a rather complex process which involves
the agreement by all EU countries. There
have been no GMOs allowed on the market since 1998 in the EU. There is also mandatory labeling for any GMOs
used in consumer food products within the EU. Basically the European Union is
against most things involving GMOs.
3. What does the U.N.’s WHO say about GMOs’
environmental and food safety concerns?
In regards to human
health and safety the FAO and the WHO have not found any GMOs that cause
allergic reactions based on their research.
They also agree that the possibility of genes transferring from GMOs to
humans is very unlikely.
As for the impact of GMOs
on the environment, the WHO has found some cases where genes did transfer from
GMOs to conventional crops. Another
concern is that with the introduction of GMOs we will lose some biodiversity in
our agricultural commodities.
Based on: Amy Harmon, “A Race to Save the Orange by
Altering Its DNA.” The New York Times, July 27, 2013. (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/28/science/a-race-to-save-the-orange-by-altering-its-dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&)
4. Briefly, describe the problem facing the Florida
citrus industry, described in the article, that might be solved by GMOs.
There is a disease that reached Florida in
2005 which causes oranges to become sour and not ripe; the disease also stunts
the growth of the oranges. This is a major problem since Florida produces much
of our country’s orange supply. They did
not find a citrus tree which was immune to this disease, but there other
species which carried a gene that made it immune to the disease. The idea was to take this gene and splice it
into the DNA of the orange crop, so that hopefully they would thus become
immune to the disease thanks to their new gene.
5. The article mentions at least four possible
sources for the gene that might save the Florida citrus industry. Try to find these four sources (near the
middle of the article) and list them.
-Two
types of vegetables
-A
virus
-A pig
6. Opinion:
a. What is
your opinion on whether GMO orange juice might gain consumer acceptance?
Like it said in the article
people will either have to accept the fact that the oranges have been
genetically modified or choose not to consume orange juice. I think if people were given the facts about
GMOs then they would accept the notion of their use in our food supply. The media is biased against GMOs and people
always believe what they hear from media without doing their own research,
which is a shame. I do think it will
gain acceptance though because it will be the cheaper option for people compared
to organic, and in today’s world saving money is a big deal.
b. Is your
answer affected at all the European Union regulation that all food products
containing GMOs must be labeled?
No, I think that the EU
is wrong in the way they treat GMOs.
Having done plenty of my own research into studies done on GMOs, I stand
by the notion that the benefits outweigh the risks. I think that they are just scared of using
them because GMOs are rather new, but as more and more positive research comes
out I think the EU will come to their senses.
I don’t think we need to label GMOs because until there is proof that
any harm comes from them then they are no different than conventional products.
c. Is your answer affected by Whole Foods’s
announcement that it will avoid stocking most GMO foods by 2018 (as noted near
the end of the article)?
Again, the only reason
Whole Foods is doing that is because they are taking advantage on society’s
ignorance about GMOs. They think that this non-use of GMOs will draw in more
consumers willing to spend more money on products just because they are “Organic”
or “Non-GMO”. And if people continue to
stay in the dark about GMOs then companies like Whole Foods win because they
can charge more money for “Organic, Non-GMO containing” products.
I think that people need
to educate themselves about GMOs, and not just trust everything they hear in
the news. The fact of the matter is that
most of the scientific community is in favor of GMOs. They
can see that GMOs have the potential to supply our growing population with a
sustainable food source. GMOs could
eliminate certain problems which affect agriculture today such as, crops dying
from: droughts, pests, weeds, and disease.
GMO blackberry vs organic blackberry
|
Personally I would rather have the one on the left which
is cheaper and greater in volume.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)